Legislature(2009 - 2010)
2009-04-10 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2009-04-10 House Journal Page 0850 HB 20 The following was read the second time: 2009-04-10 House Journal Page 0851 HOUSE BILL NO. 20 "An Act relating to commercial fishing loans for energy efficiency upgrades." with the: Journal Page FSH RPT CS(FSH) NT 3DP 3NR 1AM 159 FN1: (CED) 160 FIN RPT CS(FIN) NT 7DP 2NR 653 FN1: (CED) 654 Representative Johansen moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 20(FIN) "An Act relating to commercial fishing loans for energy efficiency upgrades and increasing the maximum amount for certain loans under the Commercial Fishing Loan Act; and providing for an effective date." There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Johansen moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 20(FIN) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 20(FIN) was read the third time. Representatives Millett, Thomas, and Seaton moved and asked unanimous consent that they be allowed to abstain from voting because of a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and the members were required to vote. The question being: "Shall CSHB 20(FIN) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2009-04-10 House Journal Page 0852 CSHB 20(FIN) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 40 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Buch, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Doogan, Edgmon, Fairclough, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Herron, Holmes, Johansen, Johnson, Joule, Kawasaki, Keller, Kelly, Kerttula, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Petersen, Ramras, Salmon, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Tuck, Wilson And so, CSHB 20(FIN) passed the House. Representative Johansen moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Stoltze gave notice of reconsideration of the vote on CSHB 20(FIN). HB 20 Representative Stoltze moved and asked unanimous consent that reconsideration of CSHB 20(FIN) be taken up on the same day. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 20(FIN) was again before the House in third reading. The question to be reconsidered: "Shall CSHB 20(FIN) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 20(FIN)--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 40 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 2009-04-10 House Journal Page 0853 Yeas: Austerman, Buch, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Doogan, Edgmon, Fairclough, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Herron, Holmes, Johansen, Johnson, Joule, Kawasaki, Keller, Kelly, Kerttula, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Petersen, Ramras, Salmon, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Tuck, Wilson And so, CSHB 20(FIN) passed the House on reconsideration. Representative Johansen moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 20(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.